Is new SF6 gas often more reliable and less expensive than using reconditioned SF6 gas as an electrical insulator?

Using new SF6 gas as an electrical insulator is generally more expensive than reconditioned SF6 gas. While new gas may provide certain advantages in terms of purity and performance, reconditioned SF6 can be a reliable alternative when it meets strict quality standards and testing parameters. The reliability of reconditioned gas can be maintained through proper processing and quality assurance protocols, allowing it to be a cost-effective option without sacrificing performance.

New SF6 gas may be considered under specific conditions, such as when higher purity is required for critical applications, but overall, it is not universally recognized as a more reliable option compared to reconditioned gas across all scenarios. Hence, the idea that it is more reliable and less expensive is not accurate, leading to the consideration that the statement is false. Additionally, the decision may vary based on the specific context and the conditions under which the gas is used.